RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim was to assess skeletal stability after maxillary advancement using either distraction osteogenesis (DO) or conventional Le Fort I osteotomy (CO) in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) or cleft palate (CP) utilising a new superimposition-based cephalometric method. METHOD: This retrospective study included patients who were treated with DO (N = 12) or CO (N = 9). Sagittal and vertical changes after surgery, and skeletal stability at 18 months post-operatively were assessed with superimposition-based cephalometry, comparing lateral cephalograms performed pre-operatively (T0), post-operatively after CO or immediately after completed distraction in DO (T1), and at 18 months of follow-up (T2). RESULTS: The mean sagittal movements from T0 to T2 in the DO and CO groups were 5.9 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively, with a skeletal relapse rate of 16% in the DO group and 15% in the CO group between T1 and T2. The vertical mean movement from T0 to T2 in the DO and CO groups was 2.8 mm and 2.0 mm, respectively, and the skeletal relapse rate between T1 and T2 was 36% in the DO group and 32% in the CO group. CONCLUSION: Sagittal advancement of the maxilla was stable, in contrast to the vertical downward movement, which showed more-extensive relapse in both groups. Despite more-extensive maxillary advancement in the DO group, the rates of skeletal relapse were similar.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) in patients with cleft lip and palate at 16 years of age and to identify predictors associated with surgical failure. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective follow-up included 91 patients with 100 cleft palates treated with SABG at a mean age of 9.2 years. The possible predictors for surgical failure analyzed were sex, dental development stadium, type of cleft, side, tooth erupting into the graft, cortical boundary, presence of a lateral incisor, extraction, preoperative expansion, oral hygiene, retention device, and age. The outcome variable for surgical success was Bergland score I and II. Surgical outcome was analyzed at 16 years of age based on intraoral radiographs, according to the Bergland index. Statistical analyses included estimation of odds ratios for predictor variables. RESULTS: The post-SABG success rate was 91% (Bergland score I and II) with a mean follow-up of 7.2 years. Surgical failure was significantly associated with poor oral hygiene. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a high success rate (91%) at a mean of 7.2 years post-SABG. Poor oral hygiene significantly increased the risk of surgical failure. This suggests that increased perioperative measures to maintain good oral health could reduce surgical failure.
